Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp

Cy Winther-Tamaki

@tamaki

407 Following
954 Followers


Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
We are ten years into the Ethereum experiment and have yet to truly find pmf, so I don’t reject the point made here outright. But I would still say the biggest failing has been a lack of compassion as an industry that has resulted in thousands (millions?) of people getting rekt with no recourse. Whether that’s from hacks, scams, or perhaps the biggest, misplacing private keys. How we could have done that better I can’t say, but I think losing trust of the public by failing them so many times is a regrettable legacy. Crypto is the business of bearer money legos, and with money, trust is first and foremost. I’m not saying not to experiment with intrinsically speculative products. Clearly that’s part of the journey, but minimizing harm to innocent but uninformed can be done at the same time.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
I was having a conversation about nuclear energy recently, and I know it’s popular across the political spectrum these days so I thought I’d publicly share why I’m against it. Nuclear still depends on a finite resource compared to something like sunlight which never can be diminished with use. So what, we stop using one finite resource (fossil fuels) just so we can start fighting over who controls access over another? I know it’s more abundant and so efficient yada yada but… induced demand, you know what I’m saying? And don’t get me started on nuclear waste. If you look at the world today, governments can’t keep commitments for a decade ahead and you’re telling me we can keep the waste secure for centuries or millennia? Give me a break. It’s the height of irresponsibility to future generations. See, the thing is, if you want a “solar punk” utopia, the energy systems must be circular, self contained. And nuclear definitely is not.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cy Winther-Tamaki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions