Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rahul Gupta
@rahul7668gupta.eth
๐งต1/5 ๐ #100DaysOfSolidity #Day10 When it comes to gas optimization in Solidity, the choice between `require` statements and custom revert errors can make a big difference. Have you ever wondered which one is more efficient? ๐คย #SolidityDev #GasOptimization
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Rahul Gupta
@rahul7668gupta.eth
๐งต2/5 ๐ #100DaysOfSolidity #Day10 `require` statements are simple to use, but they store the error message as a string, which is not very gas-efficient. Custom revert errors, introduced in Solidity 0.8.4, are more gas-optimized as they are ABI-encoded. ๐ฐย #SolidityDev #GasOptimization
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rahul Gupta
@rahul7668gupta.eth
๐งต3/5 ๐ #100DaysOfSolidity #Day10 Studies show that custom revert errors can save around 10 gas compared to `require` statements, especially when the error message is longer. That may seem small, but gas savings can add up quickly, especially for frequently called functions. ๐ย #SolidityDev #GasOptimization
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rahul Gupta
@rahul7668gupta.eth
๐งต4/5 ๐ #100DaysOfSolidity #Day10 The general recommendation is to use custom revert errors whenever possible, as they offer better gas optimization without sacrificing readability or maintainability. This helps keep your Solidity contracts as gas-efficient as possible. ๐ย #SolidityDev #GasOptimization
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rahul Gupta
@rahul7668gupta.eth
๐งต5/5 ๐ #100DaysOfSolidity #Day10 So, the next time you're writing Solidity code, consider using custom revert errors to unlock those precious gas savings! Your users (and your wallet) will thank you. ๐ #SolidityDev #GasOptimization
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction