Rahul pfp
Rahul
@rahul
@dwr.eth I'm assuming you all considered this for Farcaster (or at least Warpcast). Any insights on pros/cons of this? https://x.com/karpathy/status/1840400932292440358?s=46&t=kbCanU4xv9uAxZUU1RsKWQ
3 replies
2 recasts
169 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
It would help with programmatic spam via Warpcast. Other sources of spam: 1. Programmatic to hubs 2. Actual people using LLMs manually to post (so would pass the FaceID)
2 replies
0 recast
155 reactions

compusophy pfp
compusophy
@compusophy
could be built by a third party on top of farcaster, at the client level (faceID to cast into a channel). would be an interesting experiment way too many cons to be worth integrated with the core imo. preserving anonymity on the internet is critical and this could compromise that
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions