Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
martin ↑
@martin
pre-candidate idea for propdates 2.0, with @six shout out to @wilsoncusack @seneca for the incentives idea thoughts ?
7 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
rafa
@rafa
It seems like your goal is increase adoption or usage right? Have propdate users :: and especially those not using it :: provided any feedback on what would be best for the roadmap? For example, is markdown really a concern? Or does it have to do with gas fees?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
rafa
@rafa
(Also sorry if the previous message didn’t sound casual enough, I’m 100% for more onchain comms regarding proposal which are at the center of Nouns! So supportive from an external view)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
martin ↑
@martin
Yeah I've talked to users! The editor experience right now is a bit clunky, having to go somewhere else then copy and paste in, there's always a chance for errors and it would just make it a bit faster & better. Some of the other feedback I got led me to..
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction