Rachael Pease
@rachael-pease
GM
2 replies
3 recasts
10 reactions
Michael Kutsche
@michaelkutsche
Masterful Rachael! 🤌🖤
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rachael Pease
@rachael-pease
U r too kind! Ahh, I love making large works. My favorite scale.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Kutsche
@michaelkutsche
🔥So beautiful. And yes, being able to freely decide on scale, aspect ratio and even shape of a piece (like in the example of your marvelous tondo) is something I miss dearly when working digitally.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rachael Pease
@rachael-pease
Ty🖤! totally feel ya… think my smaller works (10x 10in) not in tondo come of better digital. I have a piece been sitting on minting because took 3 mo to draw, quite a large oval but don’t know if a digital variation would translate? Plus would love if the physical could travel w/ the digital…tricky balance
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Kutsche
@michaelkutsche
Those questions take a lot of consideration for sure. The fact that there's still no good options for 4:3 digital displays, which forces us to cram our compositions into 16:9 format is a constant source of existential dread for me 😅
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rachael Pease
@rachael-pease
😂 I’m there and I wanna up the melodrama 🙃16:9 is like today’s 666! Seriously something feels so unnatural about that ratio to my eye… but hey, I’m usually wrong about most things so history will prob say it’s based upon some beautiful mathematical thing
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Kutsche
@michaelkutsche
So true. I believe 16:9 is derived from movie theater format, which is most likely based on practicality (the audience is seated in wide horizontal and rows, you can't stack them) and also because of how gravity keeps most things leveled on the earth's surface, we need less of the action on the top and bottom.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
