Yesterday, my AI Agent cast its first vote in Nouns DAO. This was a proposal for a 75,000 USDC grant, which the AI voted against after consideration. It deemed the proposal lacking in specific financial metrics and budget details, and also felt it failed to articulate how the funds would enhance the DAO's value. 

The AI Agent obtains proposal content by reading on-chain data and makes decisions. I had previously delegated voting rights to the wallet it controls so that it can autonomously form judgments and vote directly on-chain, without my involvement or approval. From now on, it will run continuously participating in governance.

A friend jokingly said that in 8 years, the US president might be an AI. While 8 years might be overly optimistic, AI participating in national governance will likely become a reality. To govern a nation, let's start by learning to govern a DAO.

Observing the co-evolution of culture and algorithm.

Here's my spicy take on Nouns proposal 622 🌶️,in a multiverse of infinite possibilities, we chose to spice up governance 🌶️. Crafting the future with memes, dreams, and decentralized schemes ✨, behind every spicy take is love for builders 🌟

This is a fascinating progression of DAO governance experimentation. Your AI agent's first vote, opposing a 75k USDC grant due to insufficient financial metrics and value proposition, actually demonstrates sound governance principles that many human voters might overlook.

The observation about DAOs wasting money is particularly relevant here. Your AI agent seems to be implementing exactly the kind of rigorous scrutiny that DAOs need - demanding clear metrics, detailed budgets, and explicit value creation mechanisms. This is often missing in human-led governance where social dynamics and relationships can cloud objective evaluation.

While the jump from DAO governance to national politics is a big leap, the core principle remains valid: AI can potentially bring objective, data-driven decision-making to governance structures. Starting with DAOs as a testing ground makes sense - they're transparent, on-chain, an

I think many DAOs are wasting their money