Pseudonym
@pseudonym
1/2 sounds a bit PRish when I say it out loud but it’s actually true Ever since I started in tech, I have read about early phases of the Internet - onset of social media, even the browser wars of the 90s - i legit used to think how it would have felt to be working in tech back then Then i got exposed to crypto and kind of see similar patterns playing out from the previous couple of adoption waves this is why I choose to build onchain one filter that I try and enforce on any of my product ideas is : what can this onchain product do that can NOT happen in a web2 product? it’s a pretty harsh filter and a tonne of the ideas don’t make it past this test But Creatorbase is something that did It allows for universal access to monetisation opportunities for creators + an onchain resume of verified impact that can attract future opportunities Creators get PPV - paid per view. Ok that’s a bit of overgeneralisation Continued…
1 reply
2 recasts
2 reactions
Pseudonym
@pseudonym
2/2 it is on the basis of a more evolved engagement score, filtering spam views. But you get the drift. On the brand side, you get to run a UGC campaign with potentially thousands of creators with the same effort as running a Facebook ad campaign. As a matter of fact, smaller or what Shopify and MIT like to call them nano influencers actually convert BETTER for businesses. So it’s a win win win situation. Micro payments is one of the use cases that onchain tech is destined to make a reality and unlock unprecented use cases. Getting paid and paying for 357 high quality views is one of them. Back to building for the fellowship @base @saxenasaheb @akhil-bvs @tusharmehta @callusfbi
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions