I like the idea that future airdrops should take into account what a user did with past airdrops, its not popular in the industry though

founder /openventures | /proxyswap | tokenbot @clanker

don't like it. manifests bad practices. at most, public wallets should hold only a little bit of crypto - maybe to signal. selling is normal too. no need to give more airdrops to same 5 people, prefer to have more differentiated communities where different people steer the wheel & level up with success.

job: token analyst. Talk to me about football, sports, crypto, outdoors, growth, econ, investing, chess

Ya this is a good summary of why the industry generally doesn’t like it

interesting that you are focusing on holding when I just said "what they do" (more general) 

also would say comparing Farcaster might be particularly well suited to different strategies given the size & nature of communities here

yep, it's the most obvious objective reasons + users doing other valuable things with airdropped tokens that don't reflect..

IF you check what people really do, they still stake their cosmos tokens to get airdrops despite everyone having lost all hope in the token itself. Similarly but worse, people stake on the new rollup as a service & modular money projects, to get random airdrops, while VCs dump on them.

I do think there's value in targeting strong holders, potentially interested users, generally ecosystem supporters - but airdropp holding is 1 at best a small parameter to take into consideration. many others are better.