Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
I am sorry Composer actions should be composer plugins And mini apps should stay mini apps We need a dedicated term for a mini app that is invoked when creating a cast and helping or to create a cast
8 replies
1 recast
35 reactions

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Composer extensions also work @matthewfox Pick one
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
mini app categories 💫 I feel "composer" could be the category but extension > plugin?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Yes composer needs to be Else it will be hard to intuitively grasp and articulate the difference between Frame or deep link -> mini app And something pulled from the composer As composer clearly has to produce a cast while a mini app does not have to but could So we go extensions?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
I think mini apps are more flexible than that and frames + deeplinks are temporarily the primary access point until they get to a more mature state I don't think we need more words than mini apps and then it just comes down to context for what mini apps are relevant or at least that's one approach that could massively simplify everything for the end user even if to devs they have various differentiators
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

alex pfp
alex
@proxystudio.eth
hot take: composer is a confusing term most people associate it with classical music mini apps works I think, broad - can have categories within
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
I actually totally agree Its a word that makes sense when you think about it but you would never think about it
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions