Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
Something that concerns me about the fc signer architecture is how it increases the attack surface area for your account the more apps you allow to sign on your behalf This limits the propensity for users to try new apps especially if they have a large audience Solutions: portable signers? Permissions? Sessions?
25 replies
18 recasts
89 reactions

proxy pfp
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
impermanent signatures? I'd be fine resigning every week, just don't want to do it daily
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

ciefa 🐌 eth/acc pfp
ciefa 🐌 eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
I don't think a lot of people would be willing to sign once a week :/ I wouldn't mind, but I'm sure a lot of people wouldn't bother.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
889 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction