alex 🎩
@proxystudio.eth
updated clanker docs https://github.com/clanker-devco/DOCS
7 replies
6 recasts
64 reactions
Anatcrypto 🏗️🎙️🎩
@anatcrypto.eth
How is the initial $30k market cap achieved? What makes this range possible? How much ETH do you lock initially? Zero? Then where does the $30k starting market cap come from?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex 🎩
@proxystudio.eth
0 ETH locked on launch, market is just a function of supply/price settings we input when we implement anti sniping stuff we'll go back to a more normal market cap
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Anatcrypto 🏗️🎙️🎩
@anatcrypto.eth
As a meme creator, I honestly don’t care about snipers. Let them take as much as they want, whenever they want. My main priority is to make sure my bags are full before launch. Otherwise, what’s the point for me? Even Moxie gave 5% of the supply. There's no need for any anti-sniper stuff. Just give 5% of the supply to the founder, and you can keep the liquidity fees or set them to 40%—whatever works. With this setup, the number of snipers will drop significantly right away.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
alex 🎩
@proxystudio.eth
first of all, I hear you! I'm also aware that most launchpads either allow creators to buy initial supply or give them some for free. we are totally open to doing so, but most launchpads that have this model are plagued by creators dumping their free supply, probably the most common source of rugs in the space creators earn 40% of trading fees I want to test our fee model, user fee claim will be live soon. we'll adjust after if this "earn ownership & rewards the more attention you drive to your coin" model doesn't work. we'd be quite happy to keep all the trading fees, but I don't imagine our joy would be shared lol right now users have zero idea how much supply they've earned, let alone how much eth. thats on us, soon https://github.com/clanker-devco/DOCS
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Anatcrypto 🏗️🎙️🎩
@anatcrypto.eth
The problem with your model is that snipers end up doing the rug pull. And that’s not interesting at all for the founder or their followers. A small founder allocation with a 6-month vesting period, releasing 1% at a time, would be a much smarter move.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex 🎩
@proxystudio.eth
how is that different from the system have? coin creators will like receive a similar amount of tokens in either, in the dev allocation model, they have to sell to realize value in ours they also get eth with dev allo, their would still be the same sniping issue
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Anatcrypto 🏗️🎙️🎩
@anatcrypto.eth
What you're saying makes sense. Fees are definitely an interesting mechanism for generating long-term income, and it also aligns with being invested in growing the market cap. But can’t token holders just create their own pool on Uniswap or Aerodrome and cut the founder out of any profits? I’d still give the founder a small percentage (up to 5%), but with unlocks like VCs—after one year, two years, etc. Basically, I’d use a hybrid long-term approach with a safety net for the first year or two.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction