Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
basil
@itsbasil
today, very few clankers can sustain a $300k+ mc… this is not only healthy but is expected at this point in the products life unlike pump, clanker requires fc. it requires effort beyond straight stupidity, attention & cabal money it requires grassroots community formation & social validation, which cannot simply be bought on fc, as is the case with 99% of sol shitters that launch on x on pump, you’re playing a game of fabrication. everything can me gamed. everything can be manipulated on clanker, you’re playing a game of genuineness. you need a neymar score. you need a following. you need a community. you need to be here this is exactly why clanker will cycle, while pump will simply spike with periodic attention grabs… one is sustainable, the other is not this is what we’ve seen so far: phase 1: novelty → attention >10m+ >meta tokens phase 2: exuberance → reversion >3m+ >shitters pump & dump phase 3: consolidation → purpose >300k+ >grassroots communities >product launches
5 replies
9 recasts
45 reactions
alex
@proxystudio.eth
I think it’s both healthy and totally unsurprising What makes me incredibly bullish is how builders are contributing to a larger ecosystem dynamic around clanker - with each more successful longer term project being a hub Distributing value from the high, speculative volume to those who contribute positively to the maturation and growth of the project And we haven’t really shared yet our longer term plans. Feels like now or quite soon is a pretty good time to change that
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
basil
@itsbasil
sure feels like it… innit… sometime soon… innit
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
