Clankers

bit of an observation

if the narrative, art or speculation is poor the bots will win

if the narrative, art and speculation is good the bots will give better entry

clank clank

this has stood out to me too, which is not to say that sniping isn't a meaningful problem or something we aren't trying to solve 

just that some user assumptions about coins seem to hold true in spite of all evidence:
- only the best win, only the best of the best win over time
- creators do not need to buy before bots, the bots buying actually generate creator ownership. thats part of the model 
- bots typically seek to exit asap, attention & interest will always defeat a sniper 

okay back to the anti sniping huddle 🫡

working on the studio, dao, bot 

@clanker

creating a coin on clanker is free, creators earn 40% of uniswap's LP fee for the coin they request

so the more volume, the more ownership they earn in the coin and the more eth they get rewarded with 

cost to create is $0
reward for attention is up to you

"the bots buying actually generate creator ownership. thats part of the model"

Can you explain more? I'm not making the connection.

Onchain is the new online - FID 206 -  cooprecords.xyz

requires a shift in user attitude but I think thats part of this regardless

not a pump clone

anyone with distribution should be launching clankers, leveraging them as an alternate funding source, way to capture attention

Bots buying generates creator ownership is pretty powerful ngl

bots will always be involved in some way shape or form, it’s human culture that decides what has value

wen Proof of Human

agreed.  Perhaps an anti-whale feature where you can only own x% of the supply.  Helps with more fair distribution.  But ppl who really want to will just sybil that of course, but it will defeat the casual snipooor