Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex 🎩
@proxystudio.eth
active outreach is not a bad thing. I wouldn't have joined farcaster if people active here hadn't tweeted about stuff going on here. its fine to just hang out here as well, not everyone needs to be an evangelist but cults don't typically grow without them
5 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
FLOOD
@fffflood
this is a cult?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
would argue that people tweeting about farcaster is actually passive outreach, whereas DMing or replying would be active outreach
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
six
@six
valid, just lately i feel there’s so much meta discourse that ppl forget to use farcaster like an actual social app
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
TonyⓂ️inh🎩🍖📈
@tonyminh
Well said king. Im just chilling, vibing and sharing new stuff 😅
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
hanma.base.eth 🎩🍖🔵
@hanma
We goin higher, im trying to activate with farcaster to connect with people and community. And it's pretty fun i got some new friends 🙌
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kripcat.eth 🎩
@kripcat.eth
I feel like targeted outreach is worthwhile. People with large audiences on Twitter or elsewhere have the most to gain by owning those relationships and greater potential for financial income from that audience here on FC. However simultaneously these people the greatest sunk cost from having a large existing audience captured in a corporate network, and so the largest disincentive to switch from platform to protocol. If you can bring these people across you’ll bring more of the conversation across and their audience will follow, especially if they’re not cross posting to Twitter or elsewhere. 1/
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
