Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions
alex
@proxystudio.eth
부당한 박해를 받아온 한국의 데겐 농민들과 함께합니다. Farcaster는 모든 사용자를 동등하게 대해야 합니다.
3 replies
18 recasts
120 reactions
mvr 🐹
@mvr
Based on the widely quoted and screenshotted conversation, it appears they were testing logic that detects regular tipping between two accounts. Could it be that this new algorithm determined the disqualified list? Anyone on the list that can confirm? https://warpcast.com/undercover/0xdde288dd
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
I'm not sure I follow, I've seen this @undercover account tagged by korean users accusing some people of farming, but I don't know anything about it. I don't know how /degen disqualifies people, I'm sure they have a system but its not public as far as I know
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
mvr 🐹
@mvr
Neither do I but there's a lot of accusations right now that @jacek, @sui are farming with @undercover while it could just be a public test to flag accounts. So I am wondering whether anyone on the new disqualified list can confirm they are transferring their allowance to a select few every day
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
from what I can tell there is no evidence that they are farming other big accounts tipped @undercover, they may know the person (people) behind the account and want to fund it. It could be farming, but I highly doubt it and am skeptical of accusations without clear evidence
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Sui
@sui
I should not give much attention to it. But still clearing doubts, It’s operating cost for everyone who is working for DIA. DIA is working as DAO. I am also liable to send those received from DIA back to the DAO members working undercover.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
mvr 🐹
@mvr
I believe the evidence will be in Dune farcaster data, and as far as I know, that does not contain IP addresses. Maybe someone wants to investigate the verified wallets of the disqualified accounts to determine if they are part of a sophisticated network? But probably DIA is doing exactly that already. @4484 can you?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
