Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
Hyperstructure as defined by @jacob "Crypto protocols that can run for free and forever, without maintenance, interruption or intermediaries." even though I love the idea of hyperstructures and have been inspired by it in stuff i've built and am building, I think token launches should be many different things and should not conform to any particular expectation the creation of the new (coin, token, etc) can never map entirely onto a particular logic, even one as wide and dynamic as "hyperstructures" hopefully good token launches increasingly build on hyperstructures though, building tech other people can freely adopt and monetize with is hot and smart contracts are extremely well suited for this. read this piece to have your own opinion and get nerdsniped by the world computer https://jacob.energy/hyperstructures.html
3 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions
Zach
@zd
Glad to hear this resonates with you :) How do you think about the “free” and “expansive fees” part of the definition?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
probably more than stuff I can say in a single cast when I have time to write again I'll talk about how clanker fits the hyperstructure def, and how it doesn't
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Zach
@zd
All good! Would love to hear your take The one thing that feels like it specifically goes against this definition is the LP fee share I think Clanker would be 10x+ the size if you give token creators 100% of the LP fees at launch (ofc this would change as other people add liquidity, but no protocol take would make it a public good that can grow faster + get much bigger)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
