Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions

Fookinnowan 🎩🔵 pfp
Fookinnowan 🎩🔵
@fookinnowan
2 weeks ago when I was saying that some huge lockers who might be potentially looking to farm $DEGEN based on their activities & past tipping behaviour might turns out to be true. They are the 4 lockers now: @victory777m @jessikapark @jacek, you might want to take a look on this https://warpcast.com/fookinnowan/0x500fa94f
13 replies
6 recasts
29 reactions

Jiri123 pfp
Jiri123
@jiri123.eth
Their subaccounts can be found in this list https://warpcast.com/jiri123.eth/0xf54b7ee5
4 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Jacek.degen.eth 🎩 pfp
Jacek.degen.eth 🎩
@jacek
Made sure to ban everyone on this list—better late than never, I guess.
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions

Bálint Popovits🎩 pfp
Bálint Popovits🎩
@popszi
I think this is a better and more effective way to deal with farmers than just banning people automatically.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

artlu 🎩 pfp
artlu 🎩
@artlu
my 2 $degen opinion: do both Invalidations and Bans - numerical invalidation (one season only) is systematic and "fair" - IMO it can even be retroactive and rules-changing-midstream, if it stays transparent and the goal remains focused - case-by-case bans (permanent) allows the numerical invalidation approach to remain simple. A ban needs a higher threshold of community support, for more egregious obvious obfuscated extraction - don't reward for tattle-tales. but give retro grants for consistent service
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions