Founders who are leaving ETH for Solana or other new ecosystems are not the smartest.

I generally don't fully understand why this would happen (in either direction). It's like saying you are leaving Python for Rust.

Short term, I understand how the switch in either direction would provide hype and marketing push. Long term, what counts is the product (did you build something people care about?) the chain is/will be abstracted.

Hi! My name is Daniel. I am building bountycaster.xyz

Ex Phantom, 0x Project engineer.

From Italy originally, currently live in NYC

everyone works on abstraction which everyone loves until you start abstracting the bag holders away

building /societa growth lead @ackee ↑ ekinci.xyz

Interesting, so your observation is the chain also directly correlates to capital. Wouldn't capital simply flow to the best opportunity?

building /gmfarcaster network |
blockchain ENT prof |  ⌐◧-◧ Nouncillor, Nouner, BuilderDAO community resident /builder |

https://www.gmfarcaster.com/ 

I kind of see this as similar to Google Cloud offering credits to migrate from AWS

It definitely does atm — especially around grants. But even in terms of those participating on certain chains (founders chasing the liquidity).