Director of Operations at Hats.Finance, a decentral platform for Audit Competitions and Bug Bounties. 

My honest opinion, regardless of politics and based on what code / research exists, is they’d both do better if they actually shared ideas in the same language; but there is no lingua fraca (part of the reason I’ve been trying to formalize some Solana mechanics)

One of the most interesting things that those in Ethereum can learn about from Solana is Jito's MEV auction; here are some high level differences:

1. # of auctions isn't fixed per slot; dynamically changes based on txns 
2. Set of auctions implicitly defines a DAG of state priority
3. Often more efficient than PBS (!)

Do you think we can use the fact that there is randomness when you contend for the same state to have some sort of order policy enforcement(basic one is disincentivize frontrun/sandwich)?

I have gathered my thoughts regarding this in this post.

ヽ(⌐■_■)ノ♪♬ @ @gauntlet/🤖Ventures/tldr/Aera \\ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Struggling with the nature of randomness \\ main: @gaa \\ /red-bull /defi-research maxi

Do you think we can use the fact that there is randomness when you contend for the same state to have some sort of order policy enforcement(basic one is disincentivize frontrun/sandwich)?

I have gathered my thoughts regarding this in this post.
https://hackmd.io/@0xtrojan/bullshark_poh

Technically there is no mechanism that works since there are combinatorial lower bounds on fairness: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14201

But if your payoff is smooth enough (like a cfmm) then yes, you can get something like differential privacy: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1101.pdf

But there definitely does not exist an oblivious (i.e. payoff independent) mechanism for fair ordering like systems; you need to specialize it to the payoff