Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Ben
@jarmen
Can someone help me understand how we think corporate America is going to hand over millions to nouns so we can continue to fund things? Currently, the % of unknown voters is higher than known. We have a history or bias toward certain friends. Proximity to the largest voting body typical results in easier passing. Basically the human side of nouns. How will people look at this and say yes this is the group to let spend my donation.
2 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
Pierre ⌐◨-◨
@pierre-coetzee
This is what I've been thinking about as well while trying to follow all of the different POV's and your take is by far the most important question that I've come across so far, as no one seems to be able to expand on who the corporate America / Web2 brands are that will contribute financially to Nouns. How does this framework look like etc.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
I don’t know who’s still willing to fund this, but most of the names on @4156's list seem to be on the opposite side of that equation. From his vWr, I’m getting the vibe that these folks won’t work with us because, well, we’re broke. What’s even wilder is I thought some of them were supposed to become sustainable after the last round of funding. Instead, Nouns is out here paying businesses to shout “Nouns” rather than funding ones with real potential to succeed, become sustainable, and advocate for Nouns on their own. That’s public good, not feeding dozen of aligned friends of him just to scream “Nouns.”
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
