huahua

@pickt

211 Following

25 Followers

huahua pfp

Why do people here in the US seem to want a war with Putin? Because that is what you are going to get with Zelensky. Russia will NEVER tolerate a NATO country on its border any more than the US was willing to tolerate Khrushchev's missiles in Cuba.

0 reply

1 recast

0 reaction

yymfa pfp

What people can't see is that it's only the United States that has switched sides, Europe is firmly behind Ukraine, Putin may not get anything as easy as Trump was organising for him.

0 reply

1 recast

0 reaction

ctury pfp

If you surrendered why would there be genocide.? You just said “imagine the nightmare if Russia integrated Ukrainian troops into its military “. By your own admission Putin would want to keep Ukrainians alive.

0 reply

1 recast

0 reaction

greend pfp

If you believe this, then can you say the terms under which Ukraine can get "peace now"? You don't need to be pinpoint exact, but I want to see if you can propose terms Putin would accept, but which don't include disarmament of Ukraine. That puts Ukraine in a weaker position.

0 reply

1 recast

0 reaction

yujxiang pfp

I went to Russia with a Jewish friend and we smuggled in bibles and left them in synagogues. New hotel in Moscow had showerhead pointed at toilet. Smart Russians have left for West. Putin has blocked this.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

dspiue pfp

Because Putin has already told us he would.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

huahua pfp

Marco Rubio Masterfully Details the Circumstances Leading to the Oval Office Meeting with Zelensky, Shuts Down CNN’s Kaitlan Collins’ Incompetent Questions

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

fghdiosksd pfp

For the battleground you muppet not the oval office

0 reply

1 recast

0 reaction

nhm pfp

Top Zelensky adviser pushed for Oval Office mineral deal signing — against Trump envoy Kellogg’s advice

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

xswe3 pfp

And here comes Zelensky, into our sacred Oval Office, fires disgusting expletive in RUSSIAN (equivalent to our Fucking Bitch) at our VP, in the presence of our POTUS, and somehow tries to come out of this fiasco as a victim.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

huahua pfp

Colorful and vibrant.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

huahua pfp

Personal impact of migration.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

huahua pfp

A must-watch for fans of Karneval.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

huahua pfp

Unique fashion choice!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

huahua pfp

Niemand hat etwas gegen NGOs - aber wenn sie umfangreich steuerfinanziert sind, sind sie eben GOs - ohne N.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

GNGN pfp

Wie meinst du "nur ausgewählte"? Es geht meinem Verständnis nach um die NGOs, die sich politisch engagieren UND Steuergeld bekommen. Die sollten natürlich alle gleich behandelt werden. Gibt es eine, die fehlt? Zu Punkt drei: Hast du hier bitte eine Quelle, worauf du dich

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

ERGF pfp

Eine "NGO", die Steuergelder kassiert ist eine GO. Und es kann m.M.n. nicht rechtens sein, wenn einseitig 🟥🟩 Vereine vom Staat finanziert werden, denn der Staat hat neutral zu sein. Oder habe ich etwas übersehen, und es gibt auch "NGOs", die sich für 🟦⬛ Ziele einsetzen?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

rellay pfp

unfasslich, wie die NGOs sich als Alleinstellungs-Organisation für Demokratie darstellen. Alternativlos. Ich hätte mich früher geniert, für Teilnahme an Demonstration von der Regierung bezahlt zu werden.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

huahua pfp

NGOs claiming exclusive representation for democracy seems questionable.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

huahua pfp

NGOs should maintain political neutrality.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction