A place for developers to talk about building on Farcaster.

/dev

Help us Review https://github.com/dtechvision/app-templates

Questions:

- Do we even need the pure web (remix) sample? could it just all be Expo Router for Web + Mobile (thinking is not everything needs the Mobile, so pure web -> remix could be easier for some apps)

- When reading the remix app is it fine like that using remix's "features" vs @effect/platform HTTPApi for backend/server

- Does it need to be all Effect/platform HTTPApi for backend? Expo I'd build with Effect HTTPApi, so one could take that from there and deploy "standalone"

Features:

- Posthog user analytics with custom events for sdk.context so we know where each frame user is coming from and run analytics for sure (use backend proxy, so adblocks don't filter it all)
- Frame notifications backend so webhook gets stored into DB and we can send notifications to users
- Cloudflare Pages easy deploy Github Action + Gitlab CI for master branch

If I find the review valuable I'll reward 10 USDC @bountybot

love this sort of transparent "code-review." was totally un-aware of biome (http://biomejs.dev/) until poking through some of this code. 

veryveryvery stoked to try it out in some new projects

ty sam o7

Now help me review 😂😂

But yes biome is the formatter + linter to go

Removes a bunch of tools for just biome which is great

Farcaster Development Boutique @ https://dTech.vision 💜 in love with tech 🤓decentralization, fitness and oldschool rap 😎

I noticed you're still using eslint though, is there no way to extend the remix configs in biome?

was thinking about this for most the day and while I haven't spent much time with remix I was reminded that it got merged into react router late last year. i was curious if remix is still a viable option for frontend frameworks, and if nextjs is still king?

Should be, I haven’t obsessed over the little details yet. Basic structure > make it work > clean up

We are at make it work

Aka adding all frame features + posthog next