Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Credible neutrality is the difference between the high seas and Bob's waterpark. Technology ups the stakes. We have Twitter for public debate, the App Store for software, YouTube, Wikipedia, & more--critical, global, billion-person infrastructure that's nonetheless in the "waterpark" category. We're here to fix it.
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Here's a good example of what happens when you don't have credible neutrality. Bob's waterpark, Bob's rules. https://twitter.com/CharliePryor/status/1766531665898188981
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
In this case, there's a twist: Community Notes is public data, public algorithm. (Doing more than all the other web2 socials!) @bountybot $100 USDC bounty to download the data, run the algo & either prove or disprove the claim that Elon overrode it to remove a correct note from his post.
5 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Farcaster is the only social protocol today with a shot at both popularity (critical mass) & credible neutrality. Everything else is either 10-user activistware or a billion-user waterpark. This is the mission!
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Phil Liao
@philipliao
“activistware” 🤣 But it can be pretty damn cool to claim you use mastodon/bsky in many circles
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
mastodon is the furthest thing from credibly neutral. your name & audience are tied to your "home server", like
[email protected]
the redditor running your home server can (and in fact, promises to) ban you for wrongspeak see https://joinmastodon.org/covenant
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
