Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
kia
@kia.eth
why Farcaster channels ainโt hitting it:
18 replies
12 recasts
69 reactions
Michael Pfister
@pfista
seems like more of a scale issue than one of a channel ui/ux issue if farcaster had 1m DAUs channel experience could be totally different not saying channels are perfect today either
3 replies
1 recast
14 reactions
kia
@kia.eth
i think those are separate issues. this one is a scale issue, you're right. reference for other folks, i got into the interface issue here: https://warpcast.com/kia.eth/0x51e7d164
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Michael Pfister
@pfista
Yes they're separate issues, but to say channels are broken seems misdirected. Channels aren't working because there aren't enough users casting niche, fresh content daily So is the solution to change channels, or to get more users? Agreed channels aren't living up to the vision in practice, but curious to hear what you think the solution is here. Channel redesign? Remove channels? Focus on growth?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
kia
@kia.eth
well i think they're different issues. for the current 'vibe not community' thing in the screenshot i do agree that it's a scale issue. but if we did have enough scale, diversity and desire to use "channels" as different communities (a la FB Groups or Reddit) then, I think we'd run into the interface problem. the twitter interface and by extension twitter-clones are designed for a unified discourse, not a fragmented one. (see screenshot below). but the idea of channels, communities and fragmented internet goes against the principles that were used to design twitter's interface. rn, channels are a slap-on onto the twitter UI and "channels" (conceptually) and twitter interface optimize for opposing outcomes.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Todd
@tthebc01
its 100% a scale problem
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
