Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/rocketpool
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pete Kim pfp
Pete Kim
@petekim
I like Rocket Pool, but I feel like they really need to expand the deposit pool and reduce the RPL requirement for new minipools so that they can onboard way more users and validators.
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Rocketscan pfp
Rocketscan
@rocketscan.eth
Reminds me of this https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1393738154889338884
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

martykebke.eth pfp
martykebke.eth
@martykebke.eth
Feels like a dismissive take when there’s no reason RPL needs to exist. Agree if one just makes the argument about scale/decentralization from a collateral perspective but could be done w/ ETH.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Rocketscan pfp
Rocketscan
@rocketscan.eth
RPL already exists and you can't remove it without rugging existing RPL holders
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Pete Kim pfp
Pete Kim
@petekim
Plenty of research seems to be happening to remove the RPL requirement and find other sources of value for RPL. Are they all dumb like what you are insinuating? https://dao.rocketpool.net/t/options-forum-thread/2515
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rocketscan pfp
Rocketscan
@rocketscan.eth
I'll ignore your snark They are workarounds to remove the RPL bond requirement to compete with Lido CSM and Diva ETH-only validators But you can't get rid of the token without rugging existing holders. If there's no need to buy RPL it will bleed to 0
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction