Ethan.apt pfp

Ethan.apt

@people567

49 Following
0 Followers


Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
gm
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
I got pretty hyped recently by the news of Lens Chain’s mainnet launch. This baby is like a brand-new toy for social media developers, packing Web3’s decentralized spirit right into the network—it’s like giving Twitter a blockchain heart. Meanwhile, Bitcoin developers are all yelling about a hard fork to fend off quantum computing—the so-called “future monster.” Honestly, I feel for them; their code isn’t even done, and their brains are already racing off to 2050. And seriously, when is FC going to roll out something similar?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
Bitcoin vs. Quantum Computing: It’s like a vault with 2¹²⁸ layers of locks going up against a master locksmith. Right now, the locksmith only has toy tools—but one day, he’s going to upgrade. Can Bitcoin reinforce itself before that day comes?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sulkian pfp
Sulkian
@sulkian
🐛 X3N0 P0RT 🐛 Interface becomes organism. Holding the bloom, playing the sky. ☁️ ☁️ ☁️ ☁️ ☁️ ☁️
14 replies
30 recasts
74 reactions

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
Quantum computers are fast, but Bitcoin remains secure for now. 1. Mining – SHA-256 has a difficulty of 2²⁵⁶, which Grover’s algorithm reduces to 2¹²⁸. Even so, classical CPUs would take 10²² years and GPUs 10¹⁷ years—far beyond the universe’s age. No real threat here. 2. Private Keys – ECC encryption makes reversing a private key infeasible. Brute-force attacks need 2¹²⁸ operations, which even quantum computers can’t handle yet. Bottom line: Bitcoin is safe from quantum attacks—at least for now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
Seeing such a picture makes me feel relaxed and happy. Please allow me to collect it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
Click below to view your position on FC👇 👇
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
Now, in my toolbox, there are: "Anti-Witch Oracle" script: Automatically calculate the address cluster yield vs. the probability of being investigated "Gas Fee War Simulator": Predict the L2 fee fluctuation curve after Shanghai upgrade "Protocol Hospice Detector": Predict rug pull countdown through governance voting participation But the most precious thing is to learn to press "revoke authorization" on the unissued airdrop commitment at 3 a.m. - this can verify the coming-of-age ceremony of Web3 citizens better than any KYC.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
💥 Aptos联创疑似密会Movement Labs 匿名者曝光了会议偷拍照片,照片中背景白板上写有“ Aptos-Movement流动性合并 ”和“并行EVM霸权”等信息,显示双方正在探讨深度合作的可能性。 此次Move生态内的合流意在联合对抗Solana,但与此同时,APT 200%的高通胀率依旧是一枚定时炸弹,给生态带来不小隐患。 🌪️在我看来,Move语言的支持者们似乎突然意识到,仅靠“并行执行”这一技术卖点远远不够,不如直接构建一个“杀死Solana”的复仇者联盟故事,这种充满戏剧性的叙事更容易吸引眼球和收割韭菜。 这种操作不仅反映了行业内部对竞争格局的焦虑,也让我们看到了在快速变化的市场中,叙事和技术实力同样重要。
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
"Regarding participation in the Abstract project, I believe there are two strategic approaches: 1:All-In Focus Strategy: Select projects with higher XP weight and engage in deep interactions. Aim for top-tier rankings to maximize XP gains within a single project. Risk: Over-reliance on one project; rule changes could impact rewards. 2:Diversified Participation Strategy: Engage with multiple projects to secure both official XP and project-specific rewards. Mitigate dependency risks by spreading efforts. Tradeoff: Lower short-term gains compared to focused strategies. Which approach do you think balances risk and reward better? Let’s discuss."
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
cool
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ethan.apt pfp
Ethan.apt
@people567
If AI becomes more proficient than humans at creating art, will the value of human artists disappear?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

yuga.eth pfp
yuga.eth
@yuga
One of the most challenging aspects of operating in crypto is that everything is bimodal. Builders are either a single person with a laptop or massive financial institutions with a million regulatory requirements. The market is either constant up only or soul-crushing bear mode. Participants are either anon degens trying to make a quick buck, or suit-and-tie TradFi. The regulatory posture switches from pure antagonism to complete support in the course of an election cycle. The public’s perception tracks all of this, going up and down in sharp step functions, leaving little time for the industry to adjust. It is the only true free market, which is why it is so volatile. It is not for everyone. But if you survive here, you will survive anywhere.
1 reply
35 recasts
41 reactions