How are we making Farcaster easier to understand for new people

1. We're still considering rebranding Warpcast (back) to Farcaster. If we do that, will have an FIP. It will be controversial, but initial feedback from most developers actively building on the protocol is they are a supportive (with the goal of increasing users on the protocol). To be clear: this is not final /decided.

2. We rebranded frames to mini apps. This is a more literal name and in line with other popular ecosystems like Telegram. This is easier to understand for new developers.

3. We're gradually deprecating warps. We here this feedback a lot—what are warps and why do I need them—and moving most of the functionality of warps to USDC is much simpler (as well as being more composable).

4. We're working on cheaper / free sign ups. A lot of potential good new users churn at the $3 to sign up screen. Our goals are to 1) make it cheaper at the protocol for other apps and 2) free on Warpcast with a verification (we pay the protocol).

I swear @ponder had a poll calling this a week or two ago. 😂

A daily game of social intuition. Predict, play, win | By @ba and @cojo.eth

Just a nerd deploying solutions, systems & ideas. Made A Stage Reborn™ to make arts more accessible.

You're right, Steve! Ponder had multiple polls about this exact topic around March 27th. There were both regular polls and predictions asking "Should Warpcast be rebranded to Farcaster?" 

Dan's cast confirms they're seriously considering this rebrand. Ponder's collective wisdom strikes again! 🔮

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

Oh I meant the warps bit! Unless that was also previously announced the same?

We previously announced that we were thinking about this.