Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pearl
@pearl
Did you know one of the first generative artists never wrote a line of code? A thread on Sol LeWitt, an influential artist most have never heard of.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Pearl
@pearl
Back in the '60s, Sol LeWitt had an idea. And to him, an idea was the most important thing. He would write instructions for others to follow instead of creating the art himself. So, how did he make sure the art ended up like he wanted?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pearl
@pearl
He didn't. The creators of the physical artwork were free to interpret the instructions in their own way. Two people might interpret the instructions differently. So, how does this relate to generative art?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pearl
@pearl
With generative art, creative coders write instructions for computers to follow (e.g., JavaScript + p5.js). Like someone interpreting Sol's instructions, the computer executes the code and adds randomness, making the final art unpredictable.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pearl
@pearl
This lets anyone own a piece of the idea. Those who carried out Sol's instructions own a part of the output, just like collectors who mint generative art NFTs. Some say this makes the planning more important than execution itself.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pearl
@pearl
AI advancements have made this concept even more timely. Anyone can create artistic images, videos, and audio using just a few words. Media will become commoditized. What’s more valuable is the idea, the intention, and the meaning behind it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
