Dave Pazdan
@paz
Could using one of these have helped prevent the Bybit hack? - VM snapshot - Ubuntu Live USB - Dedicated device
12 replies
59 recasts
167 reactions
Dave Pazdan
@paz
🚫 Main devices = risk surface
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Shushant
@0xshushant.eth
Probably dedicated device or even just verifying blind hash between browser and hardware wallet
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
MrGox
@mistergox.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Vegeta
@super-saiyan
I feel: - VM snapshot will be too risky, because of the performance overload - Ubuntu Live USB will be okay, because of the data safety from not modifying the main drive - Dedicated device is relative depending on the device, what device?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
MeTony 💧🔑
@metony
How about just a simple module that adds time constraints on withdrawals above a certain threshold (ex: more than 10M$? 24 hours)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
shazam_meta
@shazam-meta.eth
The problem had to do with something called musking. They used a hardware wallet with multi sig technology and I had asked a similar question to Grok about using an EDR solution with multisig and it gave me a really in depth separation of the two EDR is on the endpoint while multisig is on the blockchain. You can ask Grok too and I’d recommend it because it shows pros and cons and gives way better detail. In short I think the answer is no.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Eleaz
@eleaz
Tails live usb would have been better considering u are signing billion dollars worth of eth. They probaby used windows smh
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
amusanmikel.base.eth
@amusanmikel
🥸
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Parzival
@parzival
No
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
David🎩
@fourty4
How about we envision a future of reversible txns?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
