paulx.eth pfp

paulx.eth

@paulx

123 Following
200 Followers


paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
Also learned about lum0x’s verifiable compute data @takisuteki Cool stuff!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
@183aaros.eth suggested I come to the Farcaster booth to learn about agents and here I am! brb following a bunch of agents
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
https://wallet.coinbase.com/nft/mint/eip155:8453:erc721:0x803Fc79D31AB30a39B3BD2A90171470cC82Ba44a
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
Check out my submission for share your best data work #24 on jokerace! @ilemi
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
Superchaining
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dor pfp
Dor
@dor
There was some recent minor "drama" on CT about @uniswap vs. @aerodrome volume which sparked our curiosity. So we used sim to investigate and here's what we found: Focusing on aggregator trades (used by retail, not arbitrageurs) on Base over the last 7 days: - Aerodrome has the largest aggregator trade volume - Uniswap V3 has more than twice as many aggregator trades Trade size breakdown: - Small trades (<$10k): Uniswap and PancakeSwap dominate - Larger trades ($50k+): Mostly routed to Aerodrome's deeper liquidity pools Top aggregators on Base by volume: - ODOS - 1inch - KyberNetwork On Ethereum, Uniswap remains the clear leader in aggregator trade volumes There isn't any earthshattering insights here, if anything this data shows the importance of considering multiple metrics when comparing DEX performance. You can the full thread here: https://x.com/smlxldotio/status/1841160530683445672
1 reply
4 recasts
42 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
https://wallet.coinbase.com/nft/mint/cbbtc
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ πŸ’œ pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ πŸ’œ
@betashop.eth
This is the official Moxiedrop claim frame https://moxie-frames.airstack.xyz/mi
249 replies
4642 recasts
7932 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
Mint (EVM) Contract Quickstart by @ilemi I keep coming back to this dashboard.πŸ§™β€β™‚οΈ
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
we did it @rsa.eth !
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
Just minted Day 385 on BasePaint! Hundreds of pixel artists made this together on the blockchain. Minting is open only for 24h
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
crypto is getting adopted the US via democratic process (ie voters vote for crypto-friendly candidate, rule of law win over corrupt regulators). how do u see crypto get adopted in authoritarian countries that have a facade of democracy, but actually have ruling, military-backed elites (who have a history of censorship and value extraction) ? two paths: 1. boil the frog: crypto adoption happens slowly. elites are good at rent extraction. 2. resistance: a group of young dissidents w combo of railgun + private-tooling for DAOs to organize undetected. in the country i'm thinking of, over the past century the score is basically: military: 100 young-dissident: 0 any other plausible ways this plays out?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
I just collected Vitalik: An Ethereum Story (Official Trailer) by Ethereum Stories https://ethereumfilm.xyz/Trailermint#2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
s/o to @michael-nadeau who published The DeFi Report https://thedefireport.io/ This report inspired my thinking around categorizing contracts into "sectors" above.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
What else should go into measuring Onchain GDP?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
Continuing with this analogy of "chains" as country, @ilemi floated the idea of proxying trade between trade, so i queried value flow IN and OUT of Ethereum on various bridges as a proxy for trade. - $19.8B bridged out, $15.8B bridged in - Ethereum's largest "trade partners" are Arbitrum One, Polygon & Optimism
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
That's roughtly $2.7 billion in fees paid by users to interact with various contracts on Ethereum. I tried categorizing contracts into "sectors" contributing to GDP, from this perspective, the heavy contributors to Ethereum's GDP are: 1. DEXs (& Aggregators) 2. L2s 3. Stablecoins 4. Access to RWAs and Treasuries
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
Given little consensus on a definition, a straight forward start could be: "Fees users pay to access services onchain" Here are fees users paid in the past year to access services on Ethereum. `gas.fees` courtesy of @dune.eth spell from @soispoke
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
thinking about this question from Jesse https://warpcast.com/jessepollak/0x2842a200 work shopping an approach 🚧 πŸ‘‰ https://dune.com/paulapivat/onchain-gdp
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

paulx.eth pfp
paulx.eth
@paulx
Gm czar of SuperState
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction