Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
If you're actively building a new v1 frame and not a v2 frame, why? Either reply publicly here or send me a private DC. Goal is to better understand what people are missing from v2. Reminder, v2 frames offer the ability to: - run a full mobile web app - users can add / save a frame to Warpcast (and other clients) - developers can send notifications to users in Warpcast
18 replies
22 recasts
168 reactions

patxol 🔷 anser.social  pfp
patxol 🔷 anser.social
@patxol.eth
Frames V1 do not require more than just some html fore basic function. Image gallery, a couple of call to action, in less than 1h an existing web app can share links as frames. They are not meant to create apps, and Frames V2 are great for that. Here is a couple of examples of dynamic V1 Frames that take 1h to add on top of an existing site. https://www.patxol.net/posts/velum https://troopcast.xyz/eth-mainnet/0xBC4CA0EdA7647A8aB7C2061c2E118A18a936f13D
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions