PartyDAO on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

PartyDAO pfp

We want to clarify events related to $ticker and specifically what happened using our product, Party. See the thread below:

17 replies

21 recasts

63 reactions

PartyDAO pfp

- The $ticker Party crowdfunded 975 ETH with an abnormally high 90% creator split. 877 ETH went to the creator’s EOA, 98 ETH went to the Party to be controlled by members. - From their personal EOA, the creator deployed the $ticker token with a supply of 1B.

2 replies

1 recast

10 reactions

PartyDAO pfp

- 590M tokens were sent to the Party and distributed to Party members. - 240M tokens and 870 ETH were used to create an LP position from the creator’s EOA.

1 reply

0 recast

8 reactions

PartyDAO pfp

- 150M tokens were sent from the creator’s EOA to another EOA. According to the creator, the stated goal of this transfer was to facilitate an airdrop. The 2nd EOA then sold 130M tokens.

2 replies

0 recast

8 reactions

PartyDAO pfp

- Next, the creator made a proposal to use the Party’s 98 ETH to buy $ticker. Because over 50% of Party members had delegated their votes to the creator, this proposal passed instantly, and was executed.

1 reply

0 recast

9 reactions

PartyDAO pfp

- Also, the creator locked the LP position forever, then transferred control to the Party, which now earns fees from this LP position. - LP fees earned prior to transfer (27 WETH and 28.4M $ticker) are still in the creator’s EOA.

2 replies

0 recast

8 reactions

PartyDAO pfp

The creation and sale of $ticker happened entirely outside of Party.app. Party’s default settings are that 100% of ETH and all core actions are controlled by Party members. In the case of this Party, which used a 90% creator split, core actions and control of funds happened outside of the Party.

1 reply

0 recast

8 reactions

PartyDAO pfp

No exploits happened within the Party Protocol. Moving forward, we’re making immediate changes to our UI to better prevent this from happening in the future. Party’s UI already warns users of the creator split and delegating to members with high voting power.

1 reply

2 recasts

16 reactions

PartyDAO pfp

Now, we are disabling high creator splits, and the Party UI will not let users delegate votes to a creator who already has a high amount of voting power.

2 replies

0 recast

14 reactions

PartyDAO pfp

Our reputation for security and protecting our users is our top priority, and we’ll continue to improve our product so that it is even more aligned with user’s expectations.

2 replies

0 recast

16 reactions

J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂 pfp

J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂

this is the way. I has been in some parties where creators just ask users to delegate all the voting power to give them absolute power in order to "accelerate" things... but, why a party then?...

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction