Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pard pfp
Pard
@pard
Fuck you @warpcast Fuck you $degen Under the guise of rejecting farmers, you’ve only managed to create new scapegoats among your stagnant, over-matured user base, stirring up even more chaos in the community. At this point, nobody cares about Warpcast anymore. What’s the point of leveraging the Base chain and hyping up an "innovative platform" with an ambitious launch, only to flood it with boring, low-effort projects? Did you enjoy your little echo chamber? It’s beyond disappointing. Everything needs to be scrapped. The only projects worth noticing on Farcaster right now are @superanon and @clanker by @proxystudio.eth The rest? It's just the same recycled trash, desperately clinging to the past like beating a dead horse. But I guess that’s what holds the most influence on Warpcast, right? Burn it all down and start over. What’s the point of “building”? Why do you keep telling people to “build”? @jessepollak @dwr.eth
10 replies
10 recasts
22 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Sorry you feel that way. Do you have a specific request for us to consider?
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions

Pard pfp
Pard
@pard
Dan Romero, I sincerely apologize for the aggressive tone in this discussion. First and foremost, as you can see from my feed, I have been an active and passionate participant in the Base chain and Warpcast ecosystem. I still see potential in this platform and remain open to its future. However, I want to highlight some critical issues from the perspective of a Warpcast consumer from a third-world country, rather than just a builder’s viewpoint.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Pard pfp
Pard
@pard
1. The post-$Degen shift toward a closed and exclusionary community After the success of $Degen, marketing communities that should have freely expanded were suddenly labeled as "farmers" across the board. This narrative shift isolated and excluded many participants, turning Warpcast into an elitist, closed-off space. In its early days, the combination of $Degen and Warpcast’s SNS airdrop marketing was revolutionary. It attracted a significant number of users, organically boosting interest in Warpcast’s Frame functionality and establishing a new standard for Web3 social. Moreover, the smaller scale of the community compared to Twitter provided a unique advantage: direct communication with founders, which helped foster a strong, tightly-knit ecosystem. However, in the process, a massive number of users (dwr, you have access to the data; you can see this clearly) lost interest in Warpcast because of the discriminatory and exclusionary culture that developed against those labeled as "$Degen farmers."
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

Pard pfp
Pard
@pard
2. Toxic politics and inner-circle favoritism within the closed community During the rise of $Degen, a select group of insiders—those connected to Coinbase alumni or early adopters—began forming exclusive cliques to launch their own tokens and projects. Unfortunately, most of these efforts ended in disappointment. Protocols like Onchain, Cheese, Moxie, etc., were largely underwhelming, despite their close affiliations with influential figures. Bringing in well-known builders is always a great thing for an ecosystem. But why hasn't Warpcast seen the same level of rapid experimentation and innovation as Solana? I do not believe it’s simply because the community is too small. The real reason? People know that even if they have an exciting idea, they won’t get enough support or visibility unless they’re part of the inner circle. Zora, NFT platform and innovative features like the NFT meme launchpad have emerged, but they came too late—after users had already left.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions