We need a neutral and fair system (II)

- To promote/delete post on X, we need a voting system where it doesn't matter how much $anon you have. The vote of ALL $anon holders is worth 1, as long as you hold the minimum amount (The same amount that makes you eligible to publish)

https://anoncast.org | anonymous posting for $ANON holders, powered by zk proofs | CA 0x0Db510e79909666d6dEc7f5e49370838c16D950f @anontokenbase

Solo Investor
DeFi Farmer
Degen explorer 
Chinese English Japanese

The two main critiques of @anoncast over the last day or so have been low quality posts and censorship. Hard problems with no perfect solution, so we're experimenting with the following:

On the @anoncast account:
- 5000 ANON requirement to post
- Posts can no longer be deleted (no censorship)

On Twitter / @anonbangers:
- 2M ANON requirement to promote (quality control)
- Posts can be deleted

If you've complained about censorship, you won't be anymore.
If you've complained about low quality posts, follow @anonbangers.

We'll see how this goes and iterate.

No deleting sounds good.
https://warpcast.com/slokh/0x50de3503

I don't know if you read correctly. It doesn't matter if you have 2 million $anon or 5000 $anon, both votes are worth 1. Doesn't that seem fair to you? So, what do you think is fair, that only users with 2 million $anon can promote/delete posts?