Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
pamela anderson joining substack was not on my 2024 bingo card, but in retrospect it should have been in fact, it is the only platform expansion that makes sense recently, pamela evolved from sex symbol to an icon for authenticity — a survivor who boldly reclaimed her narrative with substack, pamela strengthens this self-revolution substack is a place for long-form content and emerging communities pamela's choice in platform signals the value of depth over breadth, creating space for more nuanced, substantive, participatory conversations to do so through bypassing traditional media in favor of a subscription model solidifies pamela's step towards complete self-ownership with direct creator-to-fan relationships* fans, too, will feel a stronger sense of "ownership" in the relationship with access to both content that feels more personable and a community of fans that fosters a sense of belonging curious to see how it plays out *relationship still mediated by substack, private co w/ its own interests
11 replies
65 recasts
430 reactions

Ox.crypto 🌈 pfp
Ox.crypto 🌈
@ox-crypto.eth
Curious what is substack
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Charlie Becker pfp
Charlie Becker
@charliedbecker
It started as a blog email newsletter platform, where you can write blog posts and manage your audience and email the posts to subscribers, but they’ve built additional features on top like a microblogging platform. Their ostensible value proposition is they’re very pro-creator, and make it easy to manage and monetize your audience and charge a subscription, promising never to get between you and your email subscribers. So they take a big cut of subscription income but they offer a lot of tools and they don’t run ads. Lots of people are bullish on them but there are still questions about how solid their model and funding are, and whether or not they’ll always be as pro-creator now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction