Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

عمر.eth pfp
عمر.eth
@omarperacha.eth
Anyone got good ideas for empowering users to challenge your validity proofs when building a validium? Especially thinking about the idea of proving censorship when data availability is off-chain
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

عمر.eth pfp
عمر.eth
@omarperacha.eth
eg: users can make activity A in my dApp. Computation for A is handled off-chain for privacy. Instead, a SNARK is generated of this computation. SNARKs are hashed into a merkle tree whose root is stored on-chain. What can a user really do if we just omit their leaf from the tree? How can I empower them here?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jun  pfp
Jun
@junkim
Afaik if a proof is emitted in a zk rollup context, verifier rejects and no state transitions should happen. In a social media context, there’s no append only “chain” where the state simply halts if the proof fails—but users should prob see an ‘uncurated’ feed if the feed algorithm zkp fails?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction