Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/clankers
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ramsey 🎩🤝
@ramsey
Who owns the token makes no difference. Clankers have been listed on CeXes already. Grok (or whoever runs it) only gets to claim the fees. if anything, it makes it easier to list. All supply out there, no possibility to mint more, no code change possibility. Whoever owns some, owns it. That's it. CeXes have to buy on the open market, just like everyone else. Or make an OTC deal with @proxystudio.eth (who will correct me if I said sth that's not correct)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
oaktoebark.base.eth
@oaktoebark
It’s great point but you wouldn’t have to pay for an IP lawsuit. It’s not as cut and dry as you would think.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ramsey 🎩🤝
@ramsey
sure. I get the IP thing. Bought grumpy cat token (mainnet) back in 2021. When it came to listings, few of them passed just bcs of IP. And the token just faded away... But DRB, Clankerbot, Bankr don't infringe on any known IP. Not as far as I know...
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
oaktoebark.base.eth
@oaktoebark
The IP would be Grok as they are technically owners of the wallet.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ramsey 🎩🤝
@ramsey
but... why would anyone resent Grok making fees? It's not like it's using it's "image" or sth proprietary. Grok is giving replies to anyone and everyoe. Bankr getting in to give a reply/order to create DRB is not exactly using Grok's image. Also, one could always argue that Grok could create anything, if prompted to do so (and having the ability to do so). It is still theirs, same as these fees.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
