Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
GM Builders! There was a suggestion to change the proposal threshold back to 1 (currently 2 needed). Drop comments here as well with any feedback. I’ll also add it to the agenda for Thursday’s DAO meeting. cc: @kmacb.eth https://discord.com/channels/1039595167910477936/1178772723133067334
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
No need to exert too much energy on this. My coming in assumptions: 1- DAO is not currently sustainable 2- DAO revenues might benefit from more decentralized. L2 fees should help with aspects of #1. The veto, 15% allocations, & holder distribution all impact token demand. The 2 token min to propose isn't a higher prio
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
In regards to demand — it comes in waves and does not appear impact by admin factors. Since it’s a public goods DAO, roi is unlikely so that limits the market. Those who do buy on auction often have a prop in mind and/or want to show support for the project. Most come via other DAOs (Nouns, FWB, Purple etc).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction