Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

andrei pfp
andrei
@andreitr.eth
I haven't been active in Builder DAO, but proposals like this make me want to start voting again. Seriously, are we spending the equivalent of 160 days' worth of auction proceeds on this? https://nouns.build/dao/base/0xe8af882f2f5c79580230710ac0e2344070099432/vote/17
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Nounish Prof βŒβ—§-β—§πŸŽ© pfp
Nounish Prof βŒβ—§-β—§πŸŽ©
@nounishprof
hey just saw this -- wish I had seen this sooner and would love for you to be more involved again. We chatted about this in the call and I do think it's a good use of funds and connects directly with the audience we want to attract to Builder. Let's also keep in mind that BuilderDAO was funded with 1000 eth from Nouns. I believe it's important to align with this event for that reason more than anything. Also -- It's not anywhere near 160 days of auctions lol -- that would be 40 eth at least! Not sure if you misread the prop but the total was 4 eth not 40.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

andrei pfp
andrei
@andreitr.eth
hey hey! My perspective has always been that Builder DAO is a tech startup, and our main KPI is the growth in usage and technology. In other words, we need to build until we find product-market fit, hence the skepticism about those types of marketing expenses. If the revenue from the daily auction is ~0.025 ETH, then it would take 160 auctions to reach 4 ETH. Is this incorrect?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction