Ethereum

~70% of Base chain state has been taken over by a single protocol of questionable utility

thanks to cheap fees + storage mispricing, a tiny number of users have monopolized the majority of network resources

this has implications for every cheap fee blockchain. some thoughts 👇

the chart above visualizes how Base’s state is currently being used. size of each rectangle = how much state is used by each type of contract

the chart was generated using the same methodology as our recent blogpost looking at Ethereum. find it here:

data @ paradigm

https://github.com/sslivkoff

the chart above visualizes how Base’s state is currently being used. size of each rectangle = how much state is used by each type of contract

the chart was generated using the same methodology as our recent blogpost looking at Ethereum. find it here:

https://www.paradigm.xyz/2024/03/how-to-raise-the-gas-limit-1

how does this affect blockchain scaling?

scaling blockchains to become 100x or 1000x larger will require efficient use of computational resources

it is not viable for the majority of a network’s resources to be consumed so inefficiently

how bad is this?

in absolute terms the problem is still small. Base contract storage is only 53.4 GiB in size (compared to 245 GiB on Ethereum)

the problem has also become less severe over time. XEN state share peaked at around 85% back in october

is the problem fixed?

so far there have been no mitigations enacted to prevent future abuse

there’s nothing preventing one or ten new XEN-like protocols from emerging to fill the state with spam. especially as fees continue to fall

is this specific to Base?

not at all. XEN has left a large mark on every major EVM chain

for example, XEN is now the largest contract on Ethereum. it has been responsible for 8.8% of all Ethereum state growth over the past year and it now takes up 3.5% of all state

is XEN unique?

XEN is just one example of a broader pattern 

when cheap computational resources are combined with speculation, those resources will be used in unintended ways

blobscriptions, gas tokens, and Solana’s ORE can all be lumped in this category

what can be done?

simply put, storage needs to be repriced to reflect the true burden that it imposes on the network

there are many ways to do this, each with varying levels of impact to normal users

but pricing storage is fundamentally difficult

why is pricing storage difficult?

most of the operations within a transaction are easy to price because they happen instantaneously

but storage is different…once you pay for storage, that data gets stored by the network *forever*. so it's like pricing a lifetime subscription

sooner or later every chain will need to confront these storage spam issues

I’ve been modeling some potential fixes but it’s still a WIP

if you have ideas for how to improve storage spam or pricing hmu here or DM’s. I might be able to model it out

thanks for reading

my broad mission the past couple months has been to use ultra high resolution data to help scale Ethereum

more scaling data deep dives incoming

and if on chain data interests you, check out our tools reth and cryo

- reth https://github.com/paradigmxyz/reth
- cryo https://github.com/paradigmxyz/cryo

this tool combo uniquely enabled the analysis in this thread. it’s the only way to state diff all of base in a reasonable amount of time

what is the problem?

1) thanks to XEN, 0.3% of Base users are monopolizing 67.8% of the chain's resources

2) state is permanent. Base nodes now need to store + propagate this spam XEN data forever

3) storage abuse can continue until gas pricing is redesigned