Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
GPT o1, so far, sucks for code as far as I can tell. It’s insanely verbose and goes off the rails just as fast, but now for longer, than previous models. It has been awesome for conceptual brainstorming and system architecture. I much prefer Claude 3.5 or gpt 4, I’ll take 4o for boiler plate specifically Anyone else writing code having better experiences with o1 preview?
11 replies
4 recasts
27 reactions
Lukaa
@lukaa
interesting take devin ive found gpt4 shines more for writing concise, functional code, especially when it comes to boilerplate gpt01 seems to lean more into verbose explanations, which can be good for brainstorming or understanding system level architecture, but I can see how that’d be frustrating for coding what kind of projects have you been using it for? maybe certain prompts or constraints could help refine the output
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
It’s been absolutely atrocious for setting up this docker based Wordpress and php environment. It’s bouncing between completely outdated suggestions and it’s even gotten its own training dates incorrect on two separate occasions using completely different dates
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Lukaa
@lukaa
sounds rough, especially with such a specific environment setup like docker and wordpress outdated suggestions can really slow things down, especially if it's pulling incorrect training data but have you tried giving more detailed context in your prompts, like specifying the versions or tech stack you're working with? sometimes narrowing down the scope helps it stay on track
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
