Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Looks like im gona have to tone it down with that like button. s/o @sammdec.eth for building this very useful tool for us caststorage.com
9 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
😳
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
wake
@wake.eth
I guess this is cheaper than liking. :)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
You are making a good point here. This could result in users leaving more comments instead of likes 🤔 I know for sure I should stop liking every reply others make to me, especially when I end up replying right back.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
I’ve already not liked like 5 things 😂
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Same here, I guess it’s already working 😂
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
What a habit breaker haha! @dwr.eth I’m sure you’ve thought about these, curious your thoughts on the behaviors that are being managed for here
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
It’s probably a good idea. Now I’m only going to like casts that are truly deserving or ones that I would like to bookmark for later. This might turn likes into bookmarks unless the storage model is redesigned so that we buy storage for reactions separately.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
Up until now, I used the like to acknowledge I’ve read or seen/support the cast, which certainly can be superfluous at times. Do we know if likes factor into the algorithm for exposure of a cast?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Don’t think so because WC home feed is supposed to be ranked by chronological algo but maybe things have changed. Other clients may be doing that. But likes do matter for the “trending” algo.
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction