Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Norswap 🏴☠️✨
@norswap
In summary, permissionlessness is pretty cool and you can pry it from my cold dead fingers. ☠️ https://twitter.com/norswap/status/1690174854425923584
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
Isn't it a stretch to say that because PoS has a schelling point that roughly looks like PoG, therefore it's the same? The optionality to break out of it is a massive factor (like the ability to fork in OSS, doesn't mean every user has to maintain a fork). Disclaimer: Haven't read Jon's treatise yet.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mark Tyneway
@tynes
Thank you for dying for our sins
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
evmBrahmin
@evmbrahmin.eth
Read the thread & watched the talk. My summary: L2: PoG. Improve decentralization that’s close enough, maintain speed. Argument is that dPoS has a similar end result so take less steps to get there. L1: need full decentralization, dPoS ✅, even if practically similar to PoG. The ethos of anyone can stake is key
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
kenny 🎩
@kenny
glad someone more technical such as yourself could summarize because I had this same fundamental reaction but assumed I was missing something because I'm not nearly smart enough to decipher that tome of a post
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
