Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
retroactive grants are cool but they require builders take on all the risk (build it and you *might* get *some* funding) an alternative ✨proactive✨ approach:
26 replies
16 recasts
61 reactions
binji 🔴
@binji.eth
Interesting what about streamed retroactive grants? It seems like one of the things is upfront costs that are difficult, but with streamed retro grants based on agreed upon milestones being hit can perhaps unlock some of those burdens?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
💯 streaming grants retroactively based on previously agreed upon and executed milestones is a huge improvement. agreed it doesn't really address upfront costs. an interesting experiment: crowdfund upfront costs then share a portion of future streams with contributors
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
binji 🔴
@binji.eth
and have more metrics provable/verifiable onchain through attestations being automatically sent from credible sources Essentially need more components of the flow to become onchain/provable so the stream can’t be gamed.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
yep exactly. i imagine eas and some of the 0xsplits protocols would be great for this
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
binji 🔴
@binji.eth
I think it’s a worthwhile experiment
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction