Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fabric
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
been thinking a lot about which parts of crypto are likely to be abstracted and which parts aren’t. @flynn.eth suggested i read https://foundation.app/blog/crypto-wants-to-be-seen by @kayvon which lead me to https://cdixon.org/2019/01/08/strong-and-weak-technologies by @cdixon.eth both are phenomenal and worth reading
5 replies
3 recasts
26 reactions
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
here’s my current perspective. curious to hear from others https://twitter.com/_nonlinear/status/1742593234499485714
4 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Matthew
@matthew
I’m really excited about farcaster’s address verification graph particularly in this regard. Being able to connect FC to an app and get a rich profile, identity / social graph, and your entire onchain history is so powerful. And completely aligned with what you wrote.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kayvon
@kayvon
Take the case of digital art as an example. web3 addresses a fundamental paint point: I want to make money from my digital work. There's no equivalent in web2. You can't sell digital work in web2 because they don't have NFTs.
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
jacob
@jacob
Crypto wants to be seen. But it also wants to be used. We are in the era for making it easier to use.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
I’m in the camp that this can and should mostly be hidden. The use cases that may be future new markets are exempt, there will surely be crypto native ux that has no reason to hide it but it also needs to be better than it is currently…still. Personally I’m not that interested in those, at least for now
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
