Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sassal.eth πŸŽ©β›½ pfp
Sassal.eth πŸŽ©β›½
@sassal.eth
The latest /thedailygwei Refuel is ready for your consumption! β›½ Today's topics: - Home staker airdrops πŸ€” - SNARK proving ASIC πŸ‘€ - Twitter vs Farcaster βš”οΈ - and much more βž• Watch πŸ‘‡ https://youtu.be/SQvyqKKgbx0
5 replies
6 recasts
73 reactions

NolanV pfp
NolanV
@nolanv
If I understand correctly, you said that you're ok with a centralized EL if it's cheap to verify it But it's still an issue due to liveness; downtime in financial applications can make you lose a lot of money. Even if we have forced transactions, it's still a big unknown how we can exit a complex position from the L1
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

NolanV pfp
NolanV
@nolanv
I'm also worried about upgradeability; it's impossible to ossify enough an execution layer. How can we keep making better EL without relying on some multisig? Maybe with token voting? But if we do that, we're just building an appchain like Cosmos, where the token holder can decide the chain's state.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sassal.eth πŸŽ©β›½ pfp
Sassal.eth πŸŽ©β›½
@sassal.eth
To be clear, it's centralized block building :) Liveness is not an issue because if any of the block builders go offline, another one just picks up the slack - if all block builders go offline, a validator can just build the block itself instead of outsourcing it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

NolanV pfp
NolanV
@nolanv
I was referring to layer 2 execution layer not L1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction