Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

* Note 

"But if names don't matter, then why rename Warpcast to Farcaster? Ah ha -- trapped you in a contradiction!"

Different issue.

1. Farcaster has 10-100x the brand recognition vs. Warpcast. So changing the name is not about "the better name" -- arguably both names are nerdy and a bit weird to begin with -- and simplifying to a single name that more people have heard of.

2. Reducing from 2 to 1 name solves the confusing question for consumers -- "What's the difference between Farcaster and Warpcast?" -- and is easy enough for developers to figure out when reading the docs, similar to Uniswap.

A way to think about this is ChatGPT 4o vs. ChatGPT o3 vs. ChatGPT o4-mini-high. ChatGPT the name is fine at this point -- it's fast approaching a household name for AI in the same way Google was for search. But the model subnames are really confusing. I suspect they just simplify to ChatGPT and auto-detect which model to use in the background for normal users.

Finally someone understands names

Very silly that ppl say the "issue" with Flaunch is its name

But honestly? If the name is the worse part of the platform, I'm glad. Lmeow

I like the name, and the UI/UX.

What I think stunts its growth for a ‘fair launch’ platform, is ironically the amount of configurations there are to launching a token.

Everything following the same tokenomics is simply something less for the ‘trenchor’ to think about.