> when everything becomes a token, nothing has value

Pre-internet generating public content was hard / expensive. And thus we had a finite supply.

The median internet post is worthless. There is an infinite supply of them. Some posts are valuable, though. And in aggregate, all internet posts are far more valuable than pre-internet content. The valuable companies surface and distribute the most valuable posts through feeds, i.e. concentrating attention.

The issue has been until recently, tokens were relatively hard to create, so there was a limited supply. 

As that's gotten 10x easier (and will continue to get easier), we haven't really adapted both the tools and norms around it.

At the limit, there will be an infinite supply of tokens. Most will be worthless. And some will be valuable.

Right, but there’s a fundamental difference between content and markets that is going unacknowledged 

Adding a coin to content is basically attaching a market to it. And we do not need infinite micro markets to tell us that the median internet post is worthless 

There seems to be a disconnect between theory and perception here. Pushing financilization of everything turns people off and pushes people away, especially artists and creators 

Just because there will be infinite tokens doesn’t mean we should be actively working towards that. In the early days it’s crucial to focus on high quality content, not spamming worthless tokens