someone-build

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

I resonate with @jessepollak's attempt to normalize contentcoins as a separate asset class. My two issues are: 

1. it doesn't really represent ownership in the content or the content itself really and should therefore have a v low market cap
2. losers can lose a lot of money, markets are very volatile

suggestion: someone should build a coin launcher but the single side LP range is set from 0-$10m instead of infinity. 

less volatility, same volume, more dense liquidity.

if we really care about valuing content, let's make their markets less like memecoins @jacob

chief shitposting officer @ /builders-garden 🌳 • currently /farville 🌽

that's kinda what i'm getting at. most of these platforms put 100% of the supply in a single sided liquidity pool ranging from 0 to infinity. what if the range was to $1m MC? then liquidity would be much better, volatility lower, more you could buy/sell at reasonable prices, less people losing their shirts on content

what about a max amount of token purchasable depending on the reached mcap?

creating 
metal.build
 | the easiest way to tokenize an app 

++++
writing | https://paragraph.xyz/@slow-tokens

that's totally fine, as they should if it reaches those heights. but in the lower range a $100k MC pump or dump would require like 3-4x the spend. 
kind of like driving on sand (to the speedbump analogy)

would be an interesting speedbump, but if there was really enough demand people would start opening up new LPs to extend the range