six
@six
Wary of trying to turn this token into a Thing With Mechanisms Not commenting on this specific idea but just in general. Feels like an urge one gets when a coin starts off and you start to imagine what it could become and want to make it Real because a standalone memecoin isn’t Real Enough
8 replies
8 recasts
51 reactions
Nick
@nintynick.eth
respectfully disagree, I think emergent functionality and coordination around shared resources (like a valuable brand) are both good things to see come from a token after it starts to take off
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
six
@six
i don't disagree / this seems compatible with my view. im not saying community shouldn't work on anoncast, just that the direction of the relationship between ANON and anoncast should be clear (anoncast is built as a thing for anon, as opposed to anon being the anoncast token)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction